Sobre esta vaga
Here’s a thinking process:
1. **Analyze the Request:**
– Role: Professional job ad writer in Brazilian Portuguese
– Task: Expand a short/truncated job snippet into a complete, well-organized HTML description
– Allowed tags: Only `
` and `
- `/`
- `, no headings, no markdown
– Constraints:
– Do NOT invent specific facts not implied in the snippet or provided fields
– Can use general/sector-appropriate language for the role (e.g., “Operador de Empilhadeira” example given), but naturally, not as confirmed facts
– Keep text truthful, professional, legible
– Write entirely in Brazilian Portuguese, natural and clear, no unnecessary anglicisms
– Target size: ~700 words
– Output ONLY the HTML description, no title, no intro, no code block markers2. **Analyze the Input Data:**
– Cargo: Escrita Fiscal
– Empresa: 4T Group – Talent Serviços Terceirizados
– Localização: Santo Amaro, Bahia
– Truncated snippet:
“DESCRIÇÃO DO CARGO:. ATIVIDADES A DESENVOLVER: Conciliação de contas de clientes e fornecedores;. Conhecimento da legislação lucro real, lucro presumido, simples nacional e MEI;. Conhecimento de conferência de entrada e saída de Notas Fiscais;. Conferência dos dados entregues pela contabilidade;. Cálculos de apuração de ICMS ST, IPI, COFINS e ICMS;. Conferênia de contas de despesas, caixas, etc;. Preenchimento de guias junto aos órgãos do governo;. Cuidar de loicença como Cetesb, Ibama, etc; Ti…”– Note: “loicença” is likely a typo for “licenças” or “licenças fiscais/ambientais”. “Ti…” likely cuts off at “Tributária” or similar.
– I need to expand this responsibly without inventing specific details not present. I can use general, standard industry language that fits a “Escrita Fiscal” role, but I must be careful not to state invented facts as confirmed.3. **Identify what’s implied vs. what I can generalize:**
– Implied activities from snippet:
* Conciliation of client/supplier accounts
* Knowledge of tax regimes (lucro real, presumido, simples nacional, MEI)
* NF-e/entrada e saída conferência
* Data conference from accounting
* ICMS ST, IPI, COFINS calculation
* Expense/cash account conferencing
* Government form filling
* Licenses/permits (Cetesb, Ibama, etc.) – likely fiscal/environmental licenses
– Fields given: Company name, location, job title
– I cannot invent: specific salary, specific years of experience (unless general), specific certifications, invented benefits, etc.– What I can do: Use standard, professional descriptions of these tasks that are typical for the role, framed as responsibilities, not as confirmed requirements unless implied. I’ll phrase them as “Entre as atividades, destaca-se…” or similar, but since the output must be only HTML with `
` and `
- `/`
- `, and no headings, I need to structure it carefully.
– Wait, constraint: “use only
and
- /
- , without headings, without markdown”. So I can have paragraphs and lists, but no `
`-`
`. I need to make sure the HTML is valid and the text flows.
– Target: ~700 words. That’s quite long for just `
` and `
- `/`
- `. I’ll need to expand each point into a full paragraph or list item with substantial but factual content.
– Let’s map the snippet items to expanded, general-but-accurate descriptions:
1. Conciliação de contas de clientes e fornecedores -> Description of reconciling accounts, ensuring consistency, matching statements, etc. General language.
2. Conhecimento da legislação lucro real, lucro presumido, simples nacional e MEI -> Description of tax regimes knowledge, applicable legislation, compliance.
3. Conhecimento de conferência de entrada e saída de Notas Fiscais -> NF-e conferencing, entry/exit, validation.
4. Conferência dos dados entregues pela contabilidade -> Cross-checking accounting data, accuracy, reconciliation.
5. Cálculos de apuração de ICMS ST, IPI, COFINS e ICMS -> Tax calculations, ICMS substitution, IPI, COFINS rates, apuração.
6. Conferência de contas de despesas, caixas, etc -> Expense accounts, cash flow, petty cash, reconciliation.
7. Preenchimento de guias junto aos órgãos do governo -> Tax form filling, DARF, guias de impostos, government agencies.
8. Cuidar de licenças como Cetesb, Ibama, etc -> Fiscal/environmental licenses, Cetesb (environmental), Ibama, licensing, renewals.– I need to be careful with point 8: “Cuidar de licenças como Cetesb, Ibama, etc”. The original says “loicença como Cetesb, Ibama, etc”. This might be fiscal licenses related to the company’s operation, or environmental licenses. Since it’s “Escrita Fiscal”, I’ll treat it as fiscal/administrative licenses, but I’ll keep it general and not invent specific license types beyond what’s implied. I’ll say “licenças e alvarás necessários para o funcionamento da empresa” but wait, I shouldn’t invent. I’ll stick to “cuidar de licenças e alvarás, incluindo Cetesb, Ibama e outros órgãos fiscalizadores” – but is that implied? The snippet says “Cuidar de loicença como Cetesb, Ibama, etc”. It’s implied that the role involves these. I’ll expand generically: “atuar na gestão e renovação de licenças e alvarás junto a órgãos fiscalizadores, como Cetesb e Ibama, entre outros.” This is general and fits the implication.
– I must not say “responsável por Cetesb e Ibama” as a fact, but rather “entre as atividades, inclui-se a gestão de licenças junto a órgãos como Cetesb e Ibama”. I’ll be cautious.
– Structure plan for HTML:
I’ll create a series of `` and `
- ` elements that collectively make ~700 words. Since no headings, I’ll just have flowing text. Maybe start with a paragraph introducing the role, then a list of responsibilities, then maybe another paragraph about requirements/skills (general), but I need to be careful not to invent requirements. I can use general sector-standard phrasing.
Actually, re-read constraint: “Você PODE usar linguagem geral e padrão do setor, apropriada ao cargo (ex.: responsabilidades típicas de um ‘Operador de Empilhadeira’), desde que apresente isso de forma natural e não trate suposições como fatos confirmados.” So I can describe typical responsibilities in general terms.
“Mantenha o texto verdadeiro, profissional e legível — pensando em uma pessoa real decidindo se deve se candidatar.” So it should sound like a real job ad, but without fake info.
“Tamanho alvo: aproximadamente 700 palavras.” I need to output ~700 words of actual text within HTML tags.
“Produza SOMENTE o HTML da descrição, nada além disso (sem título, sem introdução, sem marcação de bloco de código).” So no “`html, no , just the description content in HTML. I’ll output something like:
`…texto…
- …
…
…
…
` etc., totaling ~700 words.
Let’s plan the content carefully to reach ~700 words while staying truthful and general.
I’ll structure it as:
– Opening paragraph about the role and company (using given name and location, but generic enough)
– List of responsibilities, each as ` - ` inside `
- `, with descriptive but general text
– Maybe a closing paragraph about profile/skills, again general
– All in Brazilian Portuguese, natural.Let’s count words mentally as I go, aiming for ~700.
I need to ensure I don’t invent specific years, salaries, certifications. I’ll use “experiência na área”, “conhecimento em”, etc., but vaguely.
Let’s draft the HTML content step by step.
First, understand the truncation: “Ti…” probably “Tributária” or “Técnicas”. I’ll just end that point generically.
Point 8: “Cuidar de loicença como Cetesb, Ibama, etc” – I’ll expand to “Gestão de licenças e alvarás junto a órgãos fiscalizadores, incluindo Cetesb, Ibama e outros, conforme a atividade da empresa.”
Now, let’s write. I’ll aim for each list item to be ~80-100 words, and paragraphs ~60-80 words. With maybe 7-8 list items + 2-3 paragraphs, I can
- `. I’ll need to expand each point into a full paragraph or list item with substantial but factual content.
- , without headings, without markdown”. So I can have paragraphs and lists, but no `
- `, and no headings, I need to structure it carefully.
Candidatar-se
Processo seletivo conduzido pelo empregador
