Sobre esta vaga
Here’s a thinking process:
1. **Analyze the Request:**
– Role: Professional job ad writer in Brazilian Portuguese
– Task: Expand a short/truncated job excerpt into a complete, well-organized description
– Output format: HTML only, using `
` and `
- /
- `, no headings, no markdown
– Constraints:
– Don’t invent specific facts not implied in the excerpt or given fields
– Can use general/standard sector language appropriate to the role
– Keep text truthful, professional, legible
– Write entirely in Brazilian Portuguese, natural and clear, no unnecessary anglicisms
– Target size: ~700 words
– Output ONLY the HTML description, no title, no intro, no code block markers2. **Analyze the Input Data:**
– Cargo: AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS – BA (Navalhas = Razors/Blades? Probably “Navalhas” as in cutting tools or industrial blades. BA = Bahia state, but location is given separately)
– Empresa: Grupo Dass
– Localização: Vitória da Conquista, Bahia
– Trecho original (truncated):
* “Organizar o ferramental no almoxarifado, Fazer a separação do ferramental conforme demanda de produção.”
* “Formação Acadêmica: Não informado”
* “Salário: A combinar”
* “Cargo: Auxiliar de limpeza” (This seems like a duplicate or conflicting cargo – the main cargo is “AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS”, but then it says “Auxiliar de limpeza”. I need to handle this carefully. Probably the aggregator had multiple entries or a mistake. I should focus on the primary cargo mentioned: “AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS”, but the excerpt also mentions “Auxiliar de limpeza”. I need to decide how to handle this. The rules say: “NÃO invente fatos específicos que não estejam implícitos no trecho fornecido ou nos campos dados”. So I can’t just pick one and discard the other as if it was stated. I should perhaps mention both or clarify, but carefully. Actually, looking at it: The cargo field says “AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS – BA”, then the trecho has “Cargo: Auxiliar de limpeza”. This might be two different vacancies merged, or the aggregator messed up. I need to expand based on what’s given, without inventing. I’ll treat the main role as something related to tools/equipment handling given the tasks: “Organizar o ferramental no almoxarifado, Fazer a separação do ferramental conforme demanda de produção.” That sounds like a warehouse/toolroom assistant. The “Auxiliar de limpeza” might be a separate listing or a mistake. I should probably focus on the tool/warehouse role, as it’s more specific and matches the “Ferramental” tasks. I’ll gently incorporate the cleaning aspect only if implied, but the tasks are clearly about tool organization. I’ll stick to the tool/warehouse role, as it’s the one with specific tasks. I’ll note the company is Grupo Dass, industry/commerce of sports products (from the truncation: “Empresa: Grupo Dass Indústria e comércio de produtos esportivos. Ramo: Industrial (FB)”). So it’s a sports goods industrial company.)
– Fields given: Cargo, Empresa, Localização, Trecho original parts: tasks, formation not informed, salary to combine, another cargo mention, company description, branch.Let’s list the definitive, non-invented facts:
– Company: Grupo Dass
– Location: Vitória da Conquista, BA
– Primary stated tasks from trecho: “Organizar o ferramental no almoxarifado” (Organize tools in the warehouse), “Fazer a separação do ferramental conforme demanda de produção” (Separate tools according to production demand)
– Education: Not informed (Formação Acadêmica: Não informado)
– Salary: A combinar (To be combined/negotiated)
– Company activity: “Indústria e comércio de produtos esportivos” (Sports goods industry and commerce)
– Branch: Industrial (FB) – likely “Fabricante de Bens de Consumo” or just “Industrial”, but I’ll keep it general or use “Industrial” as stated.
– There’s also “Cargo: Auxiliar de limpeza” in the trecho, but the main cargo field says “AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS”. This is conflicting. I need to handle it carefully. The rules say not to invent. I can’t just delete one. I might structure the description to reflect the tasks given, which are tool-related, and not mention “cleaning” unless I can justify it from the text. The text has both. I’ll assume the vacancy is for an auxiliary role involving tool management, and the “Auxiliar de limpeza” might be a separate or erroneous entry. I’ll focus on the tool-related tasks as they’re more descriptive. I’ll not mention cleaning if it’s not implied by the tasks. Actually, re-reading: The trecho is from an aggregator, it might have concatenated two listings. I’ll treat the role as “Auxiliar de Almoxarifado / Ferramental” based on the tasks, and ignore the “Auxiliar de limpeza” part since it’s not supported by the tasks, and the main cargo field is “AUXILIAR DE NAVALHAS”. I’ll interpret “Navalhas” as related to cutting tools or razor blades, given the company is sports goods industry. Maybe they manufacture razor blades or sports equipment involving cutting. I’ll keep it professional and general.Let’s re-express the constraints clearly:
– Output: HTML only, `` and `
- /
- `, no headings, no markdown, no title, no intro, no code block markers.
– ~700 words (target)
– Brazilian Portuguese
– No invented facts
– Can use general sector language appropriately
– Truthful, professional, legibleI need to expand the description to ~700 words, but without inventing. I’ll need to elaborate on the responsibilities using standard, generic language for such a role in an industrial/sports goods setting, while strictly sticking to what’s implied or explicitly stated. I can describe typical duties of a tool/warehouse assistant in such a context, using generic phrasing like “entre outras atividades inerentes à função” or “responsabilidades que incluem”, but I must be careful not to state them as confirmed facts if they aren’t in the text. The rules say: “Você PODE usar linguagem geral e padrão do setor, apropriada ao cargo (ex.: responsabilidades típicas de um ‘Operador de Empilhadeira’), desde que apresente isso de forma natural e não trate suposições como fatos confirmados.” So I can use standard sector language, but must not treat suppositions as confirmed facts. I need to phrase it carefully, perhaps using “entre as atividades” or “responsável por” but grounded in the given tasks.
Actually, the rule is a bit nuanced: “não trate suposições como fatos confirmados.” So if I say “O profissional será responsável por organizar o almoxarifado” that’s fine because it’s directly from the text. If I say “O profissional fará manutenção preventiva” that would be inventing. I’ll stick to what’s explicitly stated or directly implied, and use very generic, open-ended phrasing for expansion, maybe using passive or general statements that don’t commit to specific invented duties.
Let’s parse the given text again:
– “Organizar o ferramental no almoxarifado, Fazer a separação do ferramental conforme demanda de produção.” -> These are two concrete tasks.
– “Formação Acadêmica: Não informado” -> No education requirement specified.
– “Salário: A combinar” -> Salary negotiable.
– “Cargo: Auxiliar de limpeza” -> Conflict. I’ll assume the vacancy is primarily the tool one, and the “limpeza” might be a mistake or separate. I’ll not include cleaning duties unless I can imply from “almoxarifado” maybe, but better not. I’ll focus on the ferramental/warehouse role.
– “Empresa: Grupo Dass Indústria e comércio de produtos esportivos. Ramo: Industrial (FB)” -> Company makes/sells sports goods, industrial branch.
– Location: Vitória da Conquista, BAI need to produce ~700 words of HTML. That’s quite long for just expanding a few lines, without inventing. I’ll need to elaborate using very safe, generic, and implied language. I can repeat the tasks in different wording, mention the company context, the location, the salary negotiation, the unspecified education, and perhaps add general statements like “O profissional atuará em ambiente industrial, colaborando com as equipes de produção e almoxarifado” but I must ensure it’s not invented. Actually, I can say “Atividades correlatas ao gerenciamento de ferramentais e ao suporte à produção em ambiente industrial” – that’s generic and implied. But I need to be careful.
Let’s think about how to reach ~700 words without inventing. I can structure the description with paragraphs and lists of responsibilities, but each point must be either directly from the text or very broadly generic that it’s almost tautological. For example:
– “O profissional será responsável pelas
- `, no headings, no markdown, no title, no intro, no code block markers.
Candidatar-se
Processo seletivo conduzido pelo empregador
