Promotor de Vendas – COM CARRO Bahia (Candeia/Simões Filho/Camaçari)
Gnx Group · Simões Filho, Bahia · Ver no mapa
Sobre esta vaga
We need to expand the truncated description into a full job ad in HTML using only
and
- /
- . Must not invent facts not implied. The data we have: Cargo: Promotor de Vendas – COM CARRO Bahia (Candeia/Simões Filho/Camaçari). Empresa: Gnx Group. Localização: Simões Filho, Bahia. Salário: R$22,188 – R$22,200 / year (that’s yearly). Tipo de contrato: full-time.
The truncated original mentions: Vaga: * CONSULTOR DE VENDAS JR – Candeia/Simões Filho/Camaçari Setor: Tecnologia Empresa: Multi (antiga Multilaser) Modelo de contratação: CLT (Efetivo) Salário:* R$ 1.850,00 variável de até R$ 950,00 Benefícios:* Vale Transporte (conforme utilização) (necessário possuir o dinheiro para se locomover em até 10 dias, a empresa faz o pagamento depois desse período) Vale Refeição de R$ 32,00 ️ Assistência Médica SulAmérica Assistência Odontológica Porto Seguro Seguro de Vida MetLife…
We need to combine? The user gave two sets: The “Dados da vaga” and “Trecho original (truncado)”. Likely we need to expand the truncated description using the data provided (Cargo: Promotor de Vendas – COM CARRO Bahia etc). The truncated description is for a different company (Multi) but maybe they want to incorporate that? However we must not invent facts not implied. The data includes Cargo: Promotor de Vendas – COM CARRO Bahia (Candeia/Simões Filho/Camaçari). Empresa: Gnx Group. Localização: Simões Filho, Bahia. Salário: R$22,188 – R$22,200 / year. Tipo de contrato: full-time.
The truncated description mentions: Vaga: CONSULTOR DE VENDAS JR – Candeia/Simões Filho/Camaçari, Setor: Tecnologia, Empresa: Multi (antiga Multilaser), Modelo de contratação: CLT (Efetivo), Salário: R$ 1.850,00 variável de até R$ 950,00, Benefícios: Vale Transporte (conforme utilização) (necessário possuir o dinheiro para se locomover em até 10 dias, a empresa faz o pagamento depois desse período), Vale Refeição de R$ 32,00, Assistência Médica SulAmérica, Assistência Odontológica Porto Seguro, Seguro de Vida MetLife.
We have contradictory data: Cargo differs (Promotor de Vendas vs Consultor de Vendas JR). Empresa differs (Gnx Group vs Multi). Salário differs (annual ~R$22k vs monthly R$1.850 + variable). Which to trust? The instruction: “Dados da vaga:” then “Trecho original (truncado) do agregador de vagas:” Possibly the truncated text is the raw scraped text that we need to expand, using the fields given (Cargo, Empresa, etc.) to fill in missing parts. The truncated text includes some details that may be partially correct but also may be mismatched. We need to not invent facts not implied. So we need to decide which info is reliable. The “Dados da vaga” seems like structured fields, likely correct. The truncated text is from an aggregator, possibly containing some correct info but also may have errors. We must not invent facts not implied by either source. So we can only state facts that appear in either source, and we must not contradict them. If they conflict, we cannot state both as fact; we must avoid stating something that is not implied by both? The instruction: “NÃO invente fatos específicos que não estejam implícitos no trecho fornecido ou nos campos dados — sem valores de salário fabricados além do que foi informado, sem certificações falsas, sem benefícios inventados, sem exigências de anos de experiência inventadas.” So we can use facts from either source, but we must not invent. If sources conflict, we need to decide which is correct? We could phrase in a way that acknowledges both? Eg: “A vaga é para o cargo de Promotor de Vendas (também descrita como Consultor de Vendas Júnior)…” But that might be implying both are true, which could be misleading if they are not same role. However we could say: “A oportunidade é para atuar como Promotor de Vendas, com atuação nas cidades de Candeia, Simões Filho e Camaçari…” and not mention the Consultor title. That uses the Cargo field. The truncated text also mentions “Setor: Tecnologia”. That could be implied? Not in the data fields. But we could include it if it’s in truncated text. It’s not contradicted by data fields. So we can include that the vaga está no setor de tecnologia. The Empresa: Gnx Group vs Multi. Conflict. Which to use? The data fields say Empresa: Gnx Group. The truncated says Empresa: Multi (antiga Multilaser). We cannot state both as fact because they conflict. We need to choose one that is more likely correct? The data fields likely are the correct structured data. The truncated may be from aggregator with possibly outdated or wrong company name. We should not invent; we can rely on the data fields for company name. We could mention that a empresa é Gnx Group. We should not mention Multi because that would be a fact not implied by data fields (though it’s in truncated). But it’s implied by truncated, so it’s implied by the provided trecho. The instruction says we can use facts implicit in the trecho fornecido OR nos campos dados. So we can use facts from either. However if they conflict, stating both would be stating two conflicting facts, which might be considered inventing? Not exactly inventing, but stating contradictory info could be misleading. Better to avoid stating the company name if ambiguous? But we need to include something about empresa. Perhaps we can phrase: “A oportunidade é oferecida pela Gnx Group, empresa que atua no setor de tecnologia…” This uses the data field for empresa and setor from truncated. We ignore Multi. That is not inventing; we are not stating Multi as fact. It’s okay to omit it. The truncated also mentions Modelo de contratação: CLT (Efetivo). That aligns with full-time CLT. We can include that. Salary: The data fields give annual salary R$22,188 – R$22,200 / year. The truncated gives monthly base R$1.850 + variable up to R$950. Those are different. We cannot state both as fact. We need to decide which to use. The data fields likely are correct for this vacancy. The truncated may be from a different posting. We’ll use the data fields salary. We can mention that a remuneração é composta por salário fixo anual dentro da faixa informada, compatível com o mercado. We must not invent exact monthly conversion. We can say: “A remuneração oferecida varia entre R$ 22.188,00 e R$ 22.200,00 por ano, conforme desempenho e experiência.” That’s using the data. We should not mention the variable up to R$950 because that’s not in data fields. But it’s in truncated; we could mention variable component? It’s implied by truncated. But if we mention it, we need to ensure not to invent specifics beyond what’s implied. The truncated says “variável de até R$ 950,00”. That is a specific fact implied by truncated. So we could include that as part of remuneração: salário fixo + variável até R$950. However that conflicts with the annual salary figure. If we include both, we are stating two different compensation structures, which may be contradictory. Safer to stick to data fields only. The instruction: we must not invent facts not implied. Using data fields is safe. Using truncated info that contradicts data fields could be considered stating a fact that is not implied by the data fields (but is implied by truncated). The instruction says we can use facts implicit in the trecho fornecido OR nos campos dados. So we can use either, but we must not invent. If we use both, we are stating facts from both sources, which may be contradictory but each is implied by its source. Is that allowed? It might be confusing but not inventing. However the user likely expects a coherent ad using the structured data, and the truncated text is just to provide some context (benefits etc). Probably they want us to expand using the structured data, and use the truncated text to fill in benefits etc (like vale transporte, vale refeição, assistência médica, odontológica, seguro de vida). The truncated also mentions setor: tecnologia. So we can incorporate those benefits and setor. The company name conflict: maybe the correct company is Gnx Group, and the truncated text mistakenly says Multi. We should go with Gnx Group. The benefits listed in truncated are plausible for many companies; we can include them as they are implied by truncated. So we will include those benefits. The salary we will use from data fields (annual). We can also mention that além do salário fixo, há possibilidade de variável (though not in data). Safer to not mention variable if not in data. But the truncated says variável; we could mention that a vaga oferece também componente variável, conforme desempenho,
Candidatar-se
Processo seletivo conduzido pelo empregador
